For QA
Test the app with everything the other teams built into it.
Afara gives QA the frontend and backend context it derived from their code, so tests cover the paths that actually exist.
What your agent receives
Frontend context
Every screen and the order they appear in, with the calls each one makes.
Backend context
Server-side branches, retries and error paths that never show up in a ticket.
The ticket
Acceptance criteria to test against, with anything not built yet marked out of scope.
Your findings flow back to the teams that built the feature.
Injected into the QA agent
by AfaraCard payment: paths to test
- Accepted, no challenge
- Challenge passed, then challenge failed
- First authorisation declined, retry accepted: one charge only
- Out of scope until built: emailed receipt
What QA teams use most.
Paths from code
Test plans drawn from the frontend and backend as built.
Risk first
Undocumented behaviour with high confidence is listed first.
Run history
See what changed since the last comparison.
Linked to code
Every step links to the lines on GitHub at the compared commit.
Afara for other teams
See Afara on one of your own features.
A 30-minute walkthrough with an engineer. Bring two repositories and a ticket, and see the context your agent would get.